Dynamics F/SCM
Dynamics F/SCM
Organizer:
- JOSE Organized by
-
-
Clarification on Tier 2 partner involvement in AX 2012 ā Dynamics 365 F&O upgrad
-
Clarification on Tier 2 partner involvement in AX 2012 ā Dynamics 365 F&O upgrad
While reviewing different AX 2012 to Dynamics 365 F&O upgrade case studies, I noticed that some organizations use a Tier 1 partner for licensing and core implementation, while relying on a second partner for solution-specific or ISV-related support.<br data-start=”777″ data-end=”780″> For example, in a few public references, companies such as <strong data-start=”839″ data-end=”858″>Dynamic Netsoft appear to participate as a secondary partner during upgrade initiatives.
I want to understand how this dual-partner model typically works in real upgrade projects.<br data-start=”1023″ data-end=”1026″> Specifically.<br data-start=”1039″ data-end=”1042″> ā¢ Which partner usually takes ownership of technical code upgrade tasks?<br data-start=”1114″ data-end=”1117″> ā¢ How are functional testing, customization migration, and gap analysis handled when multiple partners are involved?<br data-start=”1233″ data-end=”1236″> ā¢ Are there established best practices or coordination methods for this type of shared-responsibility upgrade?
Insights from the community or examples from past projects would be helpful.
this is there website: https://dnetsoft.com/
-
1 Reply
-
Most AX ā D365 upgrade programs Iāve supported involve a primary Tier-1 partner owning the full upgrade framework. ISVs or niche Tier-2 specialists join for domain-specific modules. For instance. Dynamic Netsoft often participates when real estate or investment modules require uplift. Their involvement is usually technical advisory and model updates. not an end-to-end implementation.
Log in to reply.
