I’ve always questioned why some transactions in NAV/BC don’t carry a lot expiration date like transfer shipments out of a location, but I am particularly baffled as to why some of the sales shipment transactions in the image below do not carry the expiration date.
The transactions are listed in sequence and are all for the same item number and lot number. The adjustments in May were from a Physical inventory and the positive adjustment has an expiration date, but the shipment transactions that follow do not! Then after another physical adjustment in October, the following sales shipments do have a lot expiration date.
This image below is how we have item lot tracking defined.
Any feedback is appreciated.
Thanks and Happy New Year!
—————————— Lewis Rosenberg IT Manager Mars Fishcare Chalfont PA http://www.apifishcare.com ———————————————————————— D365UG-BC/NAVUG All-Star D365UG-BC/NAVUG Board of Advisors, Chairperson Emeritus D365UG-BC/NAVUG Programming Committee
Please note:
This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin.
Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.
Report
You have already reported this .
Welcome to our new site!
Here you will find a wealth of information created for people that are on a mission to redefine business models with cloud techinologies, AI, automation, low code / no code applications, data, security & more to compete in the Acceleration Economy!