Fixed Assets NAV 2015

  • Fixed Assets NAV 2015

    Posted by Matt-Kress on June 20, 2017 at 4:59 pm
    • Matt Kress

      Member

      June 20, 2017 at 4:59 PM

      Hello all.

      We have been maintaining our fixed assets in software other than NAV but are not wanting to incorporate them into NAV.Ā  We have been successful in importing the assets, acquisition values/dates, useful lives,Ā  accumulated depreciation and book value, but are having an issue when calculating depreciation for the first time.

      When calculating depreciation, it appears that NAV is using the book value of the asset as of the date of import rather than the acquisition date.

      We are having no luck in determining what is causing the issue, but would appreciate any help provided.

      Thanks all.

      ——————————
      Matt Kress
      Controller, Rupp Seeds Inc.
      Wauseon OH
      ——————————

    • Sue Barrett

      Member

      June 21, 2017 at 3:11 AM

      I’m not sure that this is the right answer but this works for me.
      When I import to the FA Journal – I import as follows;

      a) Ā Acquisition Cost entries
      – FA Posting Date = Acquisition Date
      – Posting Date = Last Day of Month prior to go-live cut-over
      b) Ā Depreciation entries
      – FA Posting Date & Posting Date = Last Day of Month prior to go-live cut-over

      This has always worked for me.

      ——————————
      Sue Barrett
      Consultant
      Sudbury
      ——————————
      ——————————————-

    • Colin Swinburn

      Member

      June 21, 2017 at 4:29 AM

      Hi Matt

      NAV uses the current book value and the remaining asset life to calculate depreciation. If you think about it, that is the correct way to do it. Spread the remaining value over the remaining life.

      I hope this helps….It sometimes takes a bit of testing to understand the calculations but NAV does get it right.

      For new Assets, NAV will use the original cost and the life of the asset for the initial calculation. Thereafter it will use the book value and the remaining life of the asset.

      Rgds
      Colin

      ——————————
      Colin Swinburn
      Project Director – NAV
      Charterhouse Print
      Hatfield, Herts, England
      ——————————
      ——————————————-

    • Michael Carr

      Member

      June 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM

      Colin,

      Actually, that is not a correct statement under GAAP (US).

      Original cost is divided by total useful life # of acctg periods and that is the amount used for period depreciation.

      Current valueĀ  / remaining life is not correct for this method.

      see https://www.aipb.org/pdf/DEPRECIA.pdf

      Aipb remove preview
      View this on Aipb >

      ——————————
      Michael Carr
      VP , Finance
      Philadelphia Scientific LLC
      Montgomeryville PA
      ——————————
      ——————————————-

    • David Wiser

      Member

      June 21, 2017 at 11:03 AM

      During a fixed asset session at the recent Focus 2017 event, this scenario was discussed. Ā One of the solutions presented was to add your assets with their original acquisition cost and date. Ā Then let the system calculate the depreciation up to the current period. Ā You may need to adjust your G/L balances to match this new calculated NBV/accumulated depreciation, but the system would be properly calculating depreciation. Ā One key to this approach is to turn off the G/L Integration flag while performing the catchup depreciation and then turning it back on when complete. Ā This way, the system won’t try and post to the G/L into period you already have closed.

      ——————————
      Dave Wiser
      Controller
      Beckwith & Kuffel
      Seattle WA
      ——————————
      ——————————————-

    • Sophia Gjorgievska

      Member

      June 21, 2017 at 11:29 AM

      I agree with Dave. Ā Typically, we turn off the integration to G/L, bring in the assets with the original acquisition date and a cutoff date for the accumulated depreciation; then, when all that information is in, we turn the integration to G/L back on. Ā 

      This has always worked for our clients with no issues.

      ——————————
      Sophia Gjorgievska
      Senior Consultant
      Socius
      Brecksville OH
      ——————————
      ——————————————-

    • Michael Carr

      Member

      June 22, 2017 at 4:22 PM

      I agree with Dave.

      In this manner , which does really vary much with the way we brought over accounts receivable, payable and inventory balances with an ongoing balance sheet. The asset values and accumulated depreciation are on your books so you should match acquisition costs , of course. The system calculates depreciation up to current date from acquisition date and you would adjust your accumulated depreciation as of the conversion date.

      Simple as reheating pie ( never baked one ….so that’s the best I know!)

      ——————————
      Michael Carr
      VP , Finance
      Philadelphia Scientific LLC
      Montgomeryville PA
      ——————————
      ——————————————-

    Matt-Kress replied 9 years, 4 months ago 1 Member · 0 Replies
  • 0 Replies

Sorry, there were no replies found.

The discussion ‘Fixed Assets NAV 2015’ is closed to new replies.

Start of Discussion
0 of 0 replies June 2018
Now

Welcome to our new site!

Here you will find a wealth of information created for peopleĀ  that are on a mission to redefine business models with cloud techinologies, AI, automation, low code / no code applications, data, security & more to compete in the Acceleration Economy!